nyrxman's blog

Harold Cohen blogs from his office and home in New Jersey.

Legalizing Medical Marijuana

6 Comments

A recently published article in the open-access journal BMC Neurology extols the virtues of cannabis in reducing spasticity in patients with multiple sclerosis. The results were published after a systematic review of randomized, controlled trials uncovered a reduction in spasticity and an improvement in mobility in five out of six of the trials. This is not the first time the medical literature has reported the benefits of medical marijuana for a variety of conditions, including the alleviation of excruciating pain, nausea, and vomiting and for appetite stimulation, and I believe it won’t be the last. Yet lawmakers continue to resist any change to marijuana’s legal status at the federal level.

In 2005, the Supreme Court ruled in Raich v. Gonzales that the federal government could prosecute patients using medical marijuana, even in the 13 states that have enacted state laws allowing the cultivation of the plant for medicinal purposes. While the debate on legalizing medical marijuana between state and federal governments rages on, Congress has made some progress in the legalization process. It has attempted to pass an amendment to the Justice Department spending bill that would have prohibited the department from spending any money to undermine state medical marijuana laws, thereby protecting patients who use medical marijuana for legitimate medical purposes. While this bill has been brought up twice since the 2005 Supreme Court ruling and was defeated both times, the last time it was voted on it was defeated by a smaller margin. At least Congress seems to be moving in the right direction.

The debate over legalizing marijuana is ongoing despite support by respectable medical organizations for its legalization. For example, a 1999 report from the Institute of Medicine concluded, “The accumulated data indicate a potential therapeutic value for cannabinoid drugs.” It also put to rest the notion that legalizing medical marijuana would lead to increased of marijuana use in the general population by stating that “at this point there are no convincing data to support [that] concern.” It goes on to say that there would be no problem “if the medical use of marijuana were as closely regulated as other medications with abuse potential.” To be clear, the report was not cavalier in its approach to using medical marijuana. “[Marijuana] is a powerful drug with a variety of effects,” said the report. “However, except for the harms associated with smoking, the adverse effects of marijuana use are within the range of effects tolerated for other medications.”

So why all the push-back when it comes to legalizing medical marijuana? Is it because marijuana is portrayed in the media as more of a social drug than a medicinal one? Is it because the perception is that marijuana is more harmful socially than alcohol? While alcohol is not classified as a drug, its effects mimic those of many prescription drugs, and in fact it can be as lethal as a drug if ingested in large quantities. Given the body of evidence that marijuana can be an effective drug for certain medical conditions, I am hard pressed to find a solid reason for not legalizing medical marijuana and subjecting it to the same controls as other Schedule II drugs.

I say let the FDA allow pharmaceutical companies to carry out controlled clinical trials to see if medical marijuana lives up to the hype being promulgated in the literature. If the results are positive, the FDA should then give its stamp of approval as it would for any drug, and the Supreme Court should reconsider its position. Pharmacists should endorse this course of action because, if it is approved, they are the ones who will ultimately be responsible for dispensing medical marijuana, not some storefront retailer or street-corner drug dealer.

Editor’s Note: On January 11, 2010, New Jersey became the 14th state to legalize the use of marijuana for medical purposes. It will be one of the most restrictive medical marijuana laws in the nation. Only patients with certain severe illnesses such as AIDS, cancer, Lou Gehrig’s disease, and multiple sclerosis, among others, will be eligible for a prescription.

0
Your rating: None

Comments

RxBarb's picturePharmacistRxBarbJoined: Dec, 2009
Location: Ft. Pierce, FL
Posts: 18

I am all for getting statistical data and would love to see clinical trials. Unfortunately, as was mentioned in an earlier comment, marijuana is one of those "scarlet letter" drugs and there is little chance of profit being made by big pharma. So I won't hold my breath waiting for some real data.

pharmaciststeve's picturePharmacistpharmaciststeveJoined: Jul, 2009
Location: New Albany, IN
Posts: 121

Our bureaucrats and media have placed a "scarlet letter" on certain drugs.. because of the perception of a few.

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=newsarchive&sid=ar2SdjUhVGQU

The feds are trying to escalate the war on drugs with the above study. The study was funded by National Institute on Drug Abuse and the white house has a office a national drug control policy.

Since few of us in community see ICD9's on written Rxs.. these researcher appeared to have no way to determine those with chronic pain Rxs and those of shopper/abusers taking opiates long term... yet they came to the conclusion that opiates are killing people.

They even went as far as to point out that 44% who died had a Rx for the med... when MORE (56%) who died .. it was not prescribed to !

Personally, I have a concern about smoking MJ.. we do not know yet what other by-products of smoking it will cause. HOWEVER, I know that in Calf they have a MJ soln/extact that is used in a nebulizer. I think that this presents a safer and more promising approach to a therapeutic pathway.

MJ is a weed and the feds have not figured out a way to place a "sin tax" on it.. like tobacco and alcohol... and the Pharma's have not figured out how to patent the product and charge large $$$ and get insurance to pay for it.

IMO. as soon as the above happens... we will see serious studies on the benefits of MJ use

KMiller's picturePharmacy TechnicianKMillerJoined: Aug, 2009
Location: Colorado Springs, CO
Posts: 131

My Dad feels the same way! As soon as they can regulate and tax MJ it will be as available to adults as cigarettes and alcohol. As a nebulizer treatment the drawbacks would be removed. The only drawbacks left would be fat, happy patients.

RxBarb's picturePharmacistRxBarbJoined: Dec, 2009
Location: Ft. Pierce, FL
Posts: 18

I always thought that since it was such an easy plant to grow (hence the "weed"), a better way of getting tax money would be to have potential growers buy a license each year, like a fishing or hunting license (only more expensive :) ). And honestly, I have no problem with it being used as a recreational med...seems safer than alcohol or tobacco to me.

nyrxman's picturePharmacistnyrxmanJoined: Mar, 2009
Location: Lyndhurst, NJ
Posts: 23

While taxing the growing of marijuana would certainly be a money maker for state governments, I really think it needs better control than letting the average Joe grow the plant and then taxing him. Marijuana needs to be grown in a controlled environment for medical purposes so there is a quality control component to the finished "product," just like any other drug.

I question your statement that marijuana is safer than alcohol or cigarettes. How do you define "safer?" And how do you know how safe the drug really is since we have no idea how many deaths, by auto or otherwise, are caused by being being high. We certainly have a very good handle on how many car accidents and deaths are caused by alcohol intoxicated drivers, and the results are not pretty. And since relatively no testing has been done with marijuana as a drug, how do you know it is safer than cigarettes?

I say let's get some statistical data about the widespread use of medical marijuana before we deem it "safe" or not. Then we can better draw those kind of conclusions. Like any drug, controlled clinical trials is a good start.

KMiller's picturePharmacy TechnicianKMillerJoined: Aug, 2009
Location: Colorado Springs, CO
Posts: 131

I think safer is an empirical term. "Potheads" are lethargic and hungry by stereotype. Also I know someone who has used 28grams a week for 50 years and is in perfect health. Also, to be able to pay for a growers license and decriminalize its use seems to be the most prudent direction for states to go.